{"model":"jev-latest","state":{"goal":"Score this entity on the Jev Quadrant rubric using only the supplied evidence.","framework":"jev-quadrant-v1","topic":{"id":"agent-observability","title":"Agent observability and guardrails","x_axis":"Proven Execution","y_axis":"Validated Direction"},"entity":{"id":"lakera","name":"Lakera","website":"https://www.lakera.ai","description":"API-first AI security and prompt-injection guardrails."},"evidence":[{"id":"lakera-site","kind":"product","url":"https://www.lakera.ai","date":"2026-09-24","date_kind":"accessed","recency_weight":0.9962,"summary":"Lakera’s public site markets Guard as an API for filtering prompt injection and other AI security threats. A dated 2026 primary launch post was not retrieved; the live product page is the cited item.","title":"Lakera site"}],"claims":[],"independent_checks":[],"recency":{"half_life_days":180,"as_of":"2026-09-25","mass":0.9962}},"questions":{"exec_shipped":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Has this entity shipped a generally available product used by third parties?","criteria":{"true":"Independent public evidence shows a generally available product used by third parties.","false":"The product is announced, preview-only, or evidenced only by unsourced vendor marketing with no third-party use."}},"exec_adoption":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is there credible adoption evidence?","criteria":{"true":"Credible adoption evidence exists: named customers, published user or download counts, case studies, or equivalent.","false":"Adoption claims are absent, purely anecdotal, or unsourced."}},"exec_reliability":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is there evidence of reliability, quality, security/compliance, or operational maturity?","criteria":{"true":"Evidence of reliability, quality, security/compliance, or operational maturity (uptime, incidents handled, certifications, long-running open-source project).","false":"No reliability or quality evidence is present."}},"exec_cadence":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is there evidence of continued delivery after launch?","criteria":{"true":"Evidence of continued delivery after launch (dated releases, changelog, subsequent features).","false":"Delivery appears one-shot or stalled."}},"dir_strategy":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is there a specific, consistent, dated public strategy or roadmap?","criteria":{"true":"A public strategy or roadmap is specific, consistent, and dated.","false":"Direction is vague, contradictory, or only implied."}},"dir_backed":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Are strategy or roadmap claims backed by shipped artifacts in the evidence pack?","criteria":{"true":"Roadmap or strategy claims are backed by shipped artifacts in the evidence pack.","false":"Direction is promised without corresponding delivery evidence."}},"dir_distinct":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is the evidenced direction distinct from generic category copy?","criteria":{"true":"The evidenced direction is distinct from generic category copy.","false":"Positioning is interchangeable with peers."}},"dir_invested":{"type":"noul","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Is there evidence of sustained investment in this product?","criteria":{"true":"Evidence of sustained investment (funding used for the product, research, open-source velocity, or platform expansion).","false":"No evidence of continued investment."}},"quadrant":{"type":"choice","instructions":"Use only the supplied state. Do not use prior knowledge that is not represented as evidence items. If evidence is thin, return a probability near 0.5 with the understanding that uncertainty is handled separately. Assign the entity to one Jev Quadrant cell. Do not use a hard 0.5 cut. Weigh the full evidence pack.","criteria":{"ANCHORED":"Both delivery (proven execution) and evidenced direction (validated direction) are strong.","DIRECTED":"Validated direction is better evidenced than proven execution.","OPERATIONAL":"Proven execution is better evidenced than validated direction.","FORMING":"Both axes are thin, early, or contradicted."}}}}